12/6/2023 0 Comments Best simon gameI repeat EXACTLY what he describes with ALL its consequences. (BTW: If you need another reason for disliking Friedman, I can highly recommend Naomi Klein’s Shock Doctrine)Īnyway, these hit home with me, having worked the majority of my career in financially driven companies and seen the exact effects he describes. Then came the parts where he talks about the negative impact of the „Shareholder value“ concept coined by Milton Friedman and introduces the concept of „Ethical Fading“ that happens on the race to win or to reach short term results/KPIs. I offer this review as an honest reflection by a massive fan of his work, purpose and cause.įor the first half of the book I thought “a typical Sinek: Good Message but probably could have been half the pages”. I don’t like to criticise for its own sake and as Brene Brown says, if you’re not in the ring then I don’t welcome your criticism. The subsequent chapters take the form of corporate history lessons which, whilst well researched, are rather dry and they don’t generate inspiration. Unfortunately the rest of the book does very little to add to the concepts in the first chapter. Many of these things Simon Sinek has written about and speaks about. The first chapter represents a really great synthesis of many current ideas and practices around psychological safety, vulnerability and authenticity. The subsequent chapters are a laboured exposition of the ideas in the first chapter and, in my view, unnecessary. This is where the great concept is let down by the rest of the book. The first chapter adequately explains finite and infinite games, explains what a just cause is and how to measure/identify it. The concept of infinite rather than finite games is compelling. Leaders Eat Last was similarly inspiring. And full disclosure: I’m a Simon Sinek stan and I have been powerfully moved by Start With/Find Your Why and it was a catalyst for wholesale review of my leadership approach. This is a review of the book and not the concept. It'd be great if they could do that without destroying the planet and preying on people (cough.Wells Fargo), but I just am not going to hold my breath and hope that the business community saves humanity with their infinite games. I mean, sure it makes people who spend all their hours working at a company to believe that they are doing good for the world, but I just think most of that mission stuff is BS. It should be about something bigger and more world-changing. Sinek basically says you shouldn't be doing it (or that you won't be successful doing a business) if you're just in it for the money. What I thought was really interesting about this book is that it is a book for business people where the author goes against the typical justifications for having a business. There are a hundred and one reasons that some companies do better than others-maybe it's because Apple was playing an infinite game and microsoft wasn't? But I sort of doubt it? Either way, it's impossible to prove without being totally unscientific. And the same stories of success: apple vs. In this book, it's about infinite games vs. I did not like for the same reason I knew I was not going to like it: it's a book full of cherrypicked stories of success and failure that tries to tie up a theory into a neat binary that shows how to fail and how to succeed. I was going to avoid reading this book and I knew I was going to fail to avoid reading this book because these sorts of books are my weakness.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |